On July 16, 2026, the SEC proposed Regulation E-Delivery (“Reg E-Delivery”), a new rule that would establish a comprehensive framework permitting, but not requiring, electronic delivery (“e-delivery”) as the default method for providing required disclosures and reports under the federal securities laws.
Read More
The SEC fined Pacific Financial Group $430,000 for advertising that presented hypothetical performance. In an order issued on August 9, 2024, the SEC pointed out that Pacific Financial Group advertised hypothetical performance on its public website without implementing policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the hypothetical performance was relevant to the likely financial situation and investment objectives of the intended audience.
On August 14, 2024, the SEC announced charges against 26 broker-dealers, investment advisers, and dually-registered broker-dealers and investment advisers for widespread and longstanding failures by the firms and their personnel to maintain and preserve electronic communications.
The SEC did not appeal the landmark decision of the Fifth Circuit that vacated the Private Fund Rules. The SEC could still appeal to the Supreme Court, though success there is looking less and less likely for the commission. Assuming the rules are gone for good, the private fund industry just avoided the time and expense of creating new compliance procedures.
The SEC did not appeal the landmark decision of the Fifth Circuit that vacated the Private Fund Rules. The SEC could still appeal to the Supreme Court, though success there is looking less and less likely for the commission. Assuming the rules are gone for good, the private fund industry just avoided the time and expense of creating new compliance procedures.
On June 18th, 2024, the SEC announced that R.R. Donnelley & Sons (RRD) agreed to pay over $2.1 million to settle disclosure and internal control failure charges relating to cybersecurity incidents and alerts in late 2021.
On May 13th, FinCEN and the SEC jointly released a proposed rule to apply CIP obligations on RIAs and ERAs. This new proposal comes on the heels of FinCEN’s February 13th proposal of an AML rule to designate RIAs and ERAs as “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act and apply AML/CFT program, suspicious activity reporting and record keeping requirements.
On April 17th, 2024, the Division of Examinations (“EXAMS”) published a risk alert to inform investment advisers, investors, and other market participants about the examiner’s observations on the Marketing Rule. This risk alert highlights the Division’s focus on advisers’ compliance with the marketing rule and their completion of the marketing rule items contained in Form ADV as well as Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-7 (the “Compliance Rule”), Advisers Act Rule 204-2 (the “Books and Records Rule), and the Marketing Rule’s “General Prohibitions”.